Outlandish Ideas

The Midconscious, Conscious, and Unconscious

I would like to preface this post in particular by reminding the reader that Foolhero is a blog primarily for thoughts and hypotheses, and less so for conclusions.

The conscious or ego speaks using words.

The unconscious speaks using mental or physiological reactions. The midconscious speaks to us in images and is the mediator between unconscious and conscious. The conscious is rational, yang, the unconscious is hectic, yin – and the midconscious is the relationship between these two. Dreams, visions, images that come to us, thoughtful gut feelings – these are not examples of chaos – they are rationalizations of it. This is the midconscious – which is the process of transforming the invisible into the visible.

The unconscious picks up on cues that are invisible to us.

These cues cannot instantly be translated into rational thought or language. The mind compensates this by grouping cues from the unconscious into images or symbols, which appear to spring forth from an invisible source. These images appear to us during dreams and visions primarily, however also through visual thought or “gut-feeling” wisdom. The conscious perceives these images and attempts to rationalize them. This process is from “invisible to visible”, where unconscious is “invisible”, midconscious is “to”, and conscious is “visible”.

This idea stems from the shortcomings presented by the dyad of conscious and unconscious.

We are led to believe that things such as dreams or visions are simply aspects of the unconscious. However, this does not make sense. The unconscious is better understood as limited to all that is instinctually elusive or invisible to the conscious. Dreams and visions are not totally unconscious – they are the primary step in rationalizing it. The unconscious is the artist, the midconscious is the art piece, and the conscious is the observer. The unconscious is the writer, the midconscious is the written, and the conscious is that which reflects upon the writing.

In my vocabulary, the midconscious is the closest thing I can think of to the “soul”.

In this manner, I suspect that without the soul, without a spiritual appreciation of any sort, it becomes impossible to give any sort of credence to a midconscious – in other words, to rationalize the chaos in our lives. Perhaps spiritual connection is mighty for so many people because it is a necessary tool for acknowledging the presence of a midconscious. I suspect that spirituality in this context may be replaceable by simply having a truly deep and contemplated definition of the word “soul” – however, at least one of the two seem to be mandatory.

Do you disagree? Please consider letting me know why below.

The Midconscious Right click -> View in New Tab

Outlandish Ideas

A Discussion on the Meaning of Life

As has been stated before, the meaning of life is a concept.

Concepts are comprised of identities, then traits, then grains or actions. Take the heap problem. At a point, adding a grain to a collection of sand will create a pile. The exact point at which this occurs differs based on each observer’s own assessment.

Concepts can only become fathomable to us when the logic behind a sufficient amount of their grains has become automatized.

The mind does not have the mental real estate to understand an entire concept as an image projected by its components. In automatizing the logic behind grains, the mind can allocate its resources to understanding the concept they create. We will label grains with logic that has been automatized as mastered grains.

The meaning of life can be fathomed when one has created a pile from its mastered grains.

This is to say that we can only have a feeling for the meaning of life once we have mastered the logic behind a sufficient amount of meaningful actions. Whether a collection of grains has birthed a heap is subjective. The most important thing to consider when assessing one’s understanding of the meaning of life is what one believes the meaning of life to be. Just as two people will disagree on when a collection of grains becomes a pile, two people will differ on when a life or action has transcendent meaning. Assuming honesty, both parties are always correct, unless a dramatic oversight or misconception is at play.

Fix Yourself Maybe Outlandish Ideas

Should Children be Psychologists?

It is silly that children aren’t taught basic psychology at a young age. We want an educated society. There is no basic knowledge that is as practical as the science of motivation. Children who do not understand themselves until it is too late will eventually be tainted by unfair self-loathing. They grow into emerging adults who witness an earth shattering incongruity between the psyche that they have seamlessly been forced to ascribe to, and the psyche that their souls have been unchallengeably striving towards since around early teenhood.
But what is the cure? An early understanding of the self. This can be attained by studying the basic mechanics of the brain and behavior from an early age. How in heaven’s name can we expect a child to be motivated if he himself does not even know what motivation is? How can we expect them to pay attention if the concept of attention is invisible to them? Humans desire to understand things, hands on. If you tell them not to go into a burning hotel, yet they don’t see the fire, they will not learn to see fire. We cannot command children to remain more attentive or motivated if they themselves do not understand the mechanisms of those processes.
How does motivation work? How does attention work? Will you truly claim that robbing the child of the potential to discover these things for themselves is productive? People, in their souls, have a need for personal moral virtue building. I propose that learned people or authority figures should expose children to concepts of motivation, proper habit formation, and basic functions of the brain, and also that they haven’t been doing so enough in the real world. We can solve problems by breaking them down to fathomable and tangible pieces. For example, if we truly wished to do well on an exam, we would not tell ourselves simply to “do well on the exam”. We would analyze what constitutes the behavior of one who would do well on an exam. A person who does well on an exam will study systematically, take the time to go over the questions he has made mistakes on, will understand a concept fully before moving on from it, and he won’t allow his phone to distract him. Only once we succeed at these broken down micro-problems, will we realize that the collection of these problems – the “doing well on the exam” is attainable. Now, does this sound like something you’ve always known yet haven’t actually been aware of? Imagine being told this, and being retold this as a child. I suspect that children do not receive this sort of advice nearly as frequently as they should.
Let’s extend this to a grander scale. Many people in life have no direction. They drag their walking corpse through a series of movements that they may call a routine day, as they curse the world and their unfortunate combination of genes and environments for the constant throbbing pains in the back of their skull. They lack direction. In a university setting, this may be akin to “I have no idea what I want to study so I’m in Film Studies”. Now, how might one find a direction? You may consider figuring out where you want to go, for one. And to figure out where you want to go, you would need to understand why you want to go where you want to go. To understand this, perhaps one must practice being honest with themselves. What does your soul think? If you are in science, and you have always hated science, then there may be an incongruity between what you want, and the actions you are taking to get what you tell yourself you want. If you continue to be ignorant to this deception, you may risk allowing it to grow and consume you. This doesn’t mean drop science, as we can never know what ends up being good or bad for us. It simply means acknowledge the mental and physiological indicators that your body is imposing on you so that you can understand the most productive way to proceed. Acknowledge your every “why” behind being where you are, and make sure you understand it well, or at least are on the way to understanding it. Success at this indicates a success at understanding what motivates you, and more importantly, that you know how to be honest with yourself. This skill will not likely show you a direction. You will likely realize that the new direction was no better. However, mastery of this will at the least help you determine when to change directions, and this is perhaps the true purpose of looking for direction to begin with. Does this also sound like something you know in your core, yet weren’t aware you knew? Now imagine being told this, and being retold this as a child. I suspect that children do not receive this sort of advice nearly as frequently as they should – and I do believe that the role of any great teacher figure in a child’s life is to get them to actively undergo this kind of decision making, so that they may have a chance to refine this fundamental wisdom.

What do you think? Am I right? Am I wrong? Tell me your thoughts down in the comments below.